Comparison
TarkovTrackervsTarkov Advisor
The two dominant tools for quest and hideout tracking in Tarkov. Same mission, opposite philosophies: open-source minimalism vs feature-rich with stash and tier list.
Verdict
TarkovTracker if your priority is team sync, open-source, and minimalism. Tarkov Advisor if you want tier list, stash management, and visual UX with a single login.
Side-by-side
| TarkovTracker | Tarkov Advisor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Official | No | No |
| Type | Web App | Web App |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Difficulty | Beginner | Intermediate |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Source | GitHub | — |
| Verified | June 2, 2026 | June 2, 2026 |
Which to use for what
- Group wipe with 3-5 players sharing progressBetter pick: TarkovTracker
More mature team sync with aggregated required items — the flagship feature justifying it.
- Decide what loot to keep when stash is fullBetter pick: Tarkov Advisor
Value-per-slot tier list + stash inventory that TarkovTracker doesn't handle.
- Simple tracker just for personal task progressBetter pick: TarkovTracker
Cleaner and more minimalist UX without distracting extra features.
- Plan hideout upgrades with dependency visualizationBetter pick: Tarkov Advisor
It has a graphical planner with dependency tree; TarkovTracker only lists pending modules.
- Contribute to development with PRs or custom featuresBetter pick: TarkovTracker
Open-source on GitHub with active contributor community; Advisor is closed-source.
TarkovTracker and Tarkov Advisor compete directly for the same job: helping you not get lost in Tarkov's hundreds of tasks and dozens of hideout modules. But the two tools took opposite editorial paths. One is minimalist and open-source; the other adds stash management, tier lists, and visual planner. Picking right depends less on what each does and more on how you want to work.
Opposite philosophies
TarkovTracker appeared first, in 2018, and stayed faithful to the minimalist philosophy most hardcore players prefer: it does one thing very well (task and hideout tracking) and doesn't add anything unnecessary. The TarkovTracker.org organization on GitHub maintains the project under GPL-3.0, with tarkovdata as the base repo that also powers other tools. The contributor community is active and feature decisions are open in public issues.
Tarkov Advisor came later, in 2020-2021, with a different premise: why have five open tabs (tracker, tier list, stash, hideout planner, item prices) when it can be one? It implemented task tracking but added stash management to inventory items, value-per-slot tier list, and a graphical hideout planner with dependency tree. Reports 80,000+ active users. The trade-off is that it's closed-source and its "all in one" feature set means more opinionated UX decisions.
Team sync — the most practical difference
TarkovTracker wins here clearly. Its team sync is the ecosystem's most mature: you create a team, share the invite, and each member sees the others' progress. The Required Items section aggregates every Found-In-Raid item any team member needs, so nobody accidentally sells a wrench another player needs for a future task.
Tarkov Advisor also has team sync, but less refined. Works for small groups but the required-items aggregation is less clear. If your wipe is solo, this doesn't matter. If it's a committed team, TarkovTracker is the right choice — which is why it's the tool most Tarkov organizations adopt.
Stash management
Here Advisor wins without discussion. Its system lets you mark items you have stored in your current stash. Once inventoried, the system crosses that state with your pending tasks and hideout upgrades to show you exactly what's missing — and what's extra you can sell or use.
TarkovTracker doesn't have this feature. To it, your stash is invisible: it only knows what tasks you marked completed and what items you said you had (not how many). If your value in the tool includes managing the chaos of a 60+ item stash with pending FIR tasks, Advisor saves you hours. If your wipe is simpler, the feature is overkill.
Value-per-slot tier list
Another Advisor-exclusive feature: ranking of items by value per stash slot. In Tarkov the slot is a scarce and expensive resource (Stash module upgrades in the hideout cost a lot). Knowing that an item taking 4 slots is worth the same as one taking 1 helps decide what loot to keep vs sell.
TarkovTracker has no tier list — its minimalist philosophy doesn't include it. To get the equivalent you'd have to cross-reference tarkov.dev by hand. For flippers or players who maximize stash, Advisor makes a real difference.
UX and learning curve
TarkovTracker has minimalist UX — effective but no frills. The home shows tasks ordered by trader, your completed ones, available ones, and nothing else. Setup is instant: login with email/Google, mark what you've done, done.
Advisor gives you more layout: dashboard with separate modules (tracker, stash, hideout planner, tier list, items), cross-linked navigation between them. The initial curve is steeper — knowing which module to look at for which decision takes a week. But once oriented, you have more in a single view.
Hideout planning
Tarkov has 30+ hideout modules with intricate dependencies (some require other pre-leveled modules, others require specific FIR items). TarkovTracker lists pending modules with total cost and required materials — useful but flat.
Advisor gives you a visual dependency tree showing what unlocks what. To plan the optimal order of upgrades in a long wipe, that's genuinely more useful. Again: if your hideout strategy is "upgrade when possible", overkill. If you optimize every upgrade, worth it.
Sustainability and data sources
Both tools depend on the tarkov.dev API for item and price data. That's good (ecosystem consistency) and risky (if tarkov.dev breaks, both suffer).
The difference is that TarkovTracker, being open-source, has fallback: if maintainers disappear, someone can fork and continue. Advisor depends on the company or individual maintaining it. Track record is good (years active) but the discontinuation risk is higher.
When each one wins
| Use case | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Coordinated team wipe | TarkovTracker | More mature team sync with aggregated required items |
| Simple solo task tracking | TarkovTracker | Clean UX, no distracting extras |
| 100+ item stash demanding order | Tarkov Advisor | Stash management TarkovTracker doesn't have |
| Decide loot by value-per-slot | Tarkov Advisor | Integrated tier list |
| Hideout plan with many dependencies | Tarkov Advisor | Visual dependency tree |
| Need to contribute or audit code | TarkovTracker | Open-source on GitHub |
| Single login for entire companion | Tarkov Advisor | Everything under the same Google login |
| Long-term sustainable tool | TarkovTracker | Open-source = forkable if maintainer fails |
Combined recommendation
If your wipe is solo and you don't obsess over value-per-slot, TarkovTracker is the right choice: minimalist, open-source, does one thing very well. If your wipe is in a team of 3-5, TarkovTracker also wins on team sync. If solo or not, but you want stash management, tier list, and visual hideout planner, Advisor justifies the additional feature creep. Most serious players use TarkovTracker for team sync and go to tarkov.dev directly for extra data; some prefer Advisor's integration. Neither is bad — they're editorially different and the choice depends on your real workflow.
Open-source task and hideout tracker with team-member sync
View TarkovTrackerAll-in-one companion with quests, stash, hideout planner, and value-per-slot tier list
View Tarkov Advisor